Igpu spoofing vs root patches

Hello guys. Iam currently running Monterey on my hp probook 650 g2 which has intel i5 6000u and hd 520 graphics. Iam planning to upgrade to Ventura and it has dropped support for hd 520 graphics. So I have two options. Either to spoof my igpu to kaby lake or use open core legacy patcher for root patches to bring native gpu accleration to Ventura. However I have read that igpu spoofing isn’t efficient because spoofing the igpu doesn’t fully make the igpu work and the whole experience is a bit choppy. On the other hand open core legacy patcher can make my igpu work natively on Ventura which results in better performance. Is the performance difference really noticeable? Because I know the oclp path isn’t easy and will prolly require a lot of effort and trouble shorting and still might not work but Iam willing to give it a try if performance is at hands. I would like to know from people who have spoofed their igpu(preferably sale igpu as mine) how is the performance..and if anyone over here has actually used the oclp route, how hard is it and was it worth the effort. Iam planning on following the guide for oclp if I plan to go ahead with it: https://github.com/5T33Z0/OC-Little-Translated/tree/main/11_Graphics/iGPU/Skylake_Spoofing_macOS13